Ipcb Case

2.1 DRAFT PROCESS/ARTIFACT

Based on identified triggers, author consults with relevant stakeholders and prepares draft process/artifact and submits for department review/SME review.

2.2 REVIEW PROCESS/ARTIFACT

Process Owner/SME/team members review the draft process and provide feedback as necessary. If required, the feedback is formally documented as a PIR (Process Improvement Request) as defined in PRCS-GLB-0010 ICCB Process Deployment and Institutionalization Procedure. Once internal review is completed, Process Owner/Author consults with the Process Group Lead/Chairman to incorporate the said process into the Process Group agenda.

2.3 APPROVE PROCESS/ARTIFACT

Author/Process Owner introduces/walks through the artifact in Process Group meeting. Process Group members, depending on the impact of the introduced process, will convene a process review meeting with their teams and briefly introduce the process. Related questions, if any, are directed to the Process Owner for resolution. If required, a formal PIR (Process Improvement Request) is raised in the PIR DB as defined in PRCS-GLB-0010 ICCB Process Deployment and Institutionalization Procedure.

All PIRs/feedback are tabled in the next process group meeting and discussed. If there are no major objections, the process/artifact is approved through a voice vote.

2.4 PREPARE DEPLOYMENT MATRIX

As necessary, OPAL configuration manager prepares the deployment matrix, (which is essentially list of "change sets" or versions of the artifacts that go into that particular release) and updates it on the OPAL home page under "About OPAL" section. This is also communicated to the process group, as necessary.

2.5 PROCESS DEPLOYMENT LEGEND

The

...